Subscribe to Patent News and Headlines

HEADLINES INDIA

File Foreign Application Prosecution History with Indian Patent Office
• India Plans Price Controls for Patented Drugs
• Indian Technology Companies Sharpen Focus on Patents
• India Ranks 12 in Global Innovation Index; Germany, Japan in Lead
• Indian Generics in Need of Policy Tonic
• India Emerging One of World’s Best Legal Process Outsourcing Centres
• Sun Pharma gets FDA Nod for Cancer Drug
• Imports of Pharma Drug Ingredients See 93% Increase

HEADLINES CHINA

• China Releases Intellectual Property Plan for Strategic Emerging Industries
• China, South Korea Lead BRICK Nations in Patent Filings – Study
• China Patent Inquiry System Launches English Interface
• Adept Technology Receives $1.1 Million Order from Major China Civil Explosive
Technology and Equipment Turn Key Service Provider
• CTMO to Accept Trademark Applications for Retail or Wholesale Services for
Pharmaceutical, Veterinary and Sanitary Preparations and Medical Supplies
• Proposed Changes to the Chinese Trademark Law
• Designed in America, Made in China: Protecting Intellectual Property from Cyber
Espionage

HEADLINES JAPAN

• Samsung Loses Japanese Suit against Apple
• Philips to Sell Lifestyle Entertainment Biz to Japan’s Funai
• Appcelerator Japanese Mobile Community Comes Out in Force for tiTokyo
• WIPO Director General Welcomes Increase in Japan’s Voluntary Contributions to WIPO
• Protecting Rights as a Means to Enhance Development

EDITORIAL


• How to Register a Trademark in Taiwan

Find these and all news about tt consultants at www.ttconsultants.co.in/newsletter
Related links

Difference between Trademark and Patent

Patent Post Grant Review Procedure

Trademark Watch Service India

Business Research- A tool to know the root cause!

A threat of Patent Infringement

Evaluating the effectiveness of keyword search strategy for patent identification

Measuring the standard of patent searches is inherently troublesome and poses several challenges. Plausible reasons for this could embody the length of the patenting method, and also the true worth and quality of a hunt will typically not be completed for several years when a hunt has been conducted. Opportunities are there, however, for searchers to require the initiative by seeking to reinforce the standard and comprehensiveness of the searches they perform through totally different approaches that will be integrated into their day-after-day work flow. Whereas the first aim of those approaches is to ultimately improve the standard of searches, the insights derived serve to learn all searchers within the work they are doing, no matter their expertise, and build a collective union.

The quality tips that help any patent searcher to boost their search keywords are listed as below.

1) Getting Started : Making ready the search by scoping the invention and listing key options - one in every of the most effective lessons for the beginning of the patent looking method comes from informative guide. Despite what reasonably patent search it's, there'll be some beginning data for the patent searcher. It’s going to be Invention speech act, some existing patent or some existing technology field. Admit the components of the inventions you're searching for and break them down into elements you'll be able to specifically hunt for. e.g. looking for a lock, you will wish to interrupt down the invention to elements like pin, tumbler, wafer or lever.

2) Analyze Associate in Nursing example patent – Let’s say you’re functioning on a hunt in an exceedingly field you’re not intimately aware of. Wherever does one start? If you've got a reference patent or 2, it’s an honest plan to browse those specifications well for technical keywords within the field. If you aren’t thus lucky, strive category looking till you discover one you think that may be relevant and so cracking open many patents to visualize what the common keywords ar. this will be more assisted  by keyword analysis, that is applied math analysis of the frequency of keywords. will your patent search system have this tool?

3) Think about the supply – What info are you searching? If it’s extremely technical, sort of a patent info, you recognize you'll be able to use technical keywords. If it’s not, sort of a compiled supply of news and press releases, you will wish to rethink your keywords. Audience for news and press releases is commonly a lot of general and so the lexicon used may be at a lower level. once looking for key non-patent literature in your previous art search, confine mind that you simply may have to be a lot of broad in your keyword choice (depending on the source) so as to rack up a helpful range of hits.

4) Seek advice from an associate –  Folks from totally different technical backgrounds have different jargon and ways in which to discuss with identical object. extra keywords will assist you particularly once the invention in question doesn't fall under one technical discipline. it's going to be the case that the one that wrote the patent that may be an ideal match for your search wasn't well versed in one in every of the technologies concerned, and used non-industry specific terms within the specification. If you don’t have a associate handy, be at liberty to select anyone’s brain. Generally you'll be able to bog down in an exceedingly rut!

5) Crack open the synonym finder – Since legal philosophy typically comes right down to a war of words, patent documents are generally deliberately obfuscating (i.e. confusing). Use a synonym finder to feature extra keywords to your search that may be outside of the standard jargon employed in sure subject material. Additionally deem have faith in rely on however you'll be a lot of imprecise about describing a part of Associate in nursing invention. Is that shaft journal within the bearing, or is that the member rotatable connected with it? strive varied just one or 2 of your keywords right away from narrower to a lot of general terms if you bog down in an exceedingly dead finish that leads to few hits.

Hopefully the following tip helps you in your keyword looking and you don’t feel too inundated.

Related Links :

Difference between Trademark and Patent
What are ‘invention promotion’ companies?

Patent Post Grant Review Procedure

How can you check to see if your invention is new

What Steps to follow for patent application?

Trademark Watch Service India

Business Research- A tool to know the root cause!

A threat of Patent Infringement

 
 

Samsung should let Japanese court rule on discovery request against Apple, before U.S. court assists

Magistrate decide Paul S. Grewal, United Nations agency assists decide Lucy Koh in a very few Apple v. Samsung lawsuits unfinished within the Northern District of California, issued a ruling on Wednesday evening denying, for the present, a call for participation by Samsung to conduct sure discovery of Apple in California so as to use the created material and obtained data against sure infringement claims brought by Apple in Japan. Samsung will bring this request once more within the u.  s., however the California-based court does not wish to interfere with the Japanese court. If the Japanese court problems a ruling indicating that it'd take into account this discovery effort helpful, it seems that Samsung are going to be in pretty good condition to finally prevail on its motion. however as long because the Japanese court doesn't offer any indication that it's interested, Samsung's motion is doomed to fail.

Basically, Samsung hopes that it will prove associate Apple patent invalid by showing that the proprietary invention was obvious over practicality enforced in associate early version of the iPhone Apple http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=6115018545486080676#editor/target=post;postID=8845390693956133782discharged in 2007. At the time, U.S. jurisprudence had a grace amount (which was abolished by the 2011 America Invents Act), permitting the filing of patent applications up to a year when initial publication, however the remainder of the globe (at least the jurisdictions I know) followed the first-to-file (not first-to-invent) rule. that is why Samsung wouldn't be ready to create this same argument in a very U.S. court. however it desires to learn from the further-reaching discovery that may be conducted below U.S. rules so as to capture proof that will prove useful in Japan. On specific, Samsung needs to get the subsequent material:

    All documents that proof, mirror or confer with the sale, transfer, lease, or supply available of any iPhone to someone or entity before June 29, 2007;

    Physical exemplars of any iPhone that was created on the market available, transfer, lease, or supply available to someone or entity before June 29, 2007;

    A physical example of the iPhone that was utilized in the presentation by Steve Jobs at Mac-world 2007 on Jan nine, 2007; and

    A physical example of the iPhone that was utilized in the video "iPhone target-hunting tour" announce to Apple's web site on June twenty two, 2007.

Apart from the word "all" within the initial item, this request appeared moderately specific to the court. however the court exercised its discretion to deny this request (without prejudice, since the case will change), with the outcome-determinative issue having been Samsung's failure to prove that the Japanese court goes to be receptive to the invention requested. Apple didn't prove that the Japanese court will not be receptive -- however it's Samsung United Nations agency desires one thing here, and decide Grewal thought it a lot of applicable to let the Japanese court rule on the corresponding discovery request. decide Grewal's order "notes that Samsung’s failure to hunt discovery earlier within the foreign judicature suggests that Samsung could also be making an attempt to avoid or cross cut the wants of the Japanese court". The U.S. court does not wish to "undermine the Tokyo court's management of this case".

You may also be interested in :
AIA Services
XLPATPatent Monitoring
Samsung V/S apple battle goes on with new apple I phone 5 and Samsung Galaxy S III 
What Steps to follow for patent application?
How can you check to see if your invention is new
What are ‘invention promotion’ companies?